DPS Administrative Code Inspector himself should assist you in bringing witnesses. Try to fit in record information about the witnesses brought in by you, and in explanations or in the minutes state: “When excited for me to present an administrative case, I in the presence of 2 witnesses (Name, contact details) drafted the act of photographing the roadway, confirming the lack of road signs (marking lines), indicating the abort maneuver me. ” At worst, if not living in conflict with the law inspector DPS resist the draw of witnesses and to place information about their participation in the protocol required to certify to the court information will remain on the recorder. Since not every camera can be immediately after photographing automatically issue a print out photos, you need to add: “In connection with the technical costs, I will provide photos directly to a hearing.” According to Section 13.22. Order of the Interior Ministry on 20 April 1999 N 297 on end of the shift DPS inspector must return all of the identified offenses made up the materials, along with documents in the duty section. Further, by virtue of subsection 70.4.
Order Ministry of the Interior on March 1, 1999 N 150 after the end DPS inspector change materials passed to the duty part, they must be immediately registered. Thus, after the protocol inspector DPS has no right to collect any evidence in the case, and the driver right, because the law for it is not prohibited. If the inspector DPS through their actions (threats, actual physical force) will not take photographs and draw up an act, then this procedure can be continued after your material.
However, an even greater extent the Bolshevik government was concerned about the growing real autonomy in the region, which concentrated large-scale industrial production of St. Petersburg, forest wealth of the North, ports and fisheries Baltic, White and Barents seas, strong forces of the army and Baltiyskiskogo Navy. Subsequently, almost to the beginning of the twenty-first century, our country only fragmented, but administrative units – multiplied. Often – for purely political reasons. Now, though cautiously and selectively, but the process is running in the opposite direction – towards the consolidation of administrative units.
Perm formed and Kamchatka Krai, expanded by the addition of the Krasnoyarsk Territory neighbors; Ust-Orda Buryat Autonomous merged, though not without problems, the Irkutsk Region. And the main purpose of which is punishable in this case is the alignment of the economic situation in the country and reducing the number of subsidized regions. In the future it is also possible association of the Tyumen region, Khanty-Mansiysk and Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Areas; Sverdlovsk, Chelyabinsk and Kurgan regions. Results according to experts in Russia should be optimally no more than 50-55 of the Federation. QUI PRODEST? Even when the priority of economic problems in the process of merging regions and districts have to remember that in this complex process faced by many and interwoven interests. Someone comes from an ancient principle of "better to be first in the village than the second – in Rome." A shake-up at unifying bureaucracy, he could lose revenue and influence. Someone in front of counts due to the enlargement of federal subject and add to that, and in the other.
And the question of unification of St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region is also the first all a question of education to work more effectively territorial economic complex. With careful consideration of social and psychological circumstances, of course – not to harm the same "economy".
